Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 45
Filtrar
1.
Support Care Cancer ; 32(3): 148, 2024 Feb 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38326573

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study examines providers' and clinic staff's perspectives on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) implementation at an academic medical center. METHODS: An anonymous and voluntary survey was administered to Henry Ford Cancer providers and clinic staff 18 months after PROs program implementation in September 2020, to obtain their feedback on perceived barriers, impact on workflows, and PROs administration frequency in routine cancer care. RESULTS: A total of 180 providers and 40 clinic staff were invited to complete the survey; 31% and 63% completed the survey, respectively. Approximately 68% of providers reported that electronically integrated PROs scores were either beneficial or somewhat beneficial to their patients, while only 28% of the clinic staff reported that PROs were beneficial or somewhat beneficial to patients. According to the clinic staff, the most common barriers to PROs completion included lack of patients' awareness of the utility of the program with respect to their care, patients' health status at check-in, and PROs being offered too frequently. CONCLUSION: There is favorable acceptance of the PROs program by providers, but clinic staff found it less favorable. Interventions to address barriers and improve program engagement are needed to ensure broad adoption of PROs in oncology practice.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , Neoplasias/terapia , Oncología Médica , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
2.
Laryngoscope ; 133(11): 2999-3005, 2023 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37017269

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Determine the relationship between cognitive function and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: This IRB-approved retrospective cohort study included all patients treated between August 2015 and March 2020 undergoing major surgery for aerodigestive cancer or cutaneous/thyroid cancer that required free-flap reconstruction at Henry Ford Hospital. Routine administration of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was completed as part of preoperative psychosocial evaluation. Outcomes included postoperative diagnosis of delirium, discharge disposition, return to the emergency department within 30 days of surgery, and readmission within 30 days of surgery. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to determine the associations between preoperative MoCA score and each outcome measure. RESULTS: One hundred thirty-five patients with HNC were included in the study (mean [SD] age, 60.7 [±10.8] years; 70.4% [n = 95] male; 83.0% [n = 112] White, 16.3% [n = 22] Black). The average preoperative MoCA score was 23.4 (SD ± 4.5). Based on the MoCA score, 35% (n = 47) scored ≥26 (i.e., normal cognitive status), 55.6% (n = 75) scored between 18 and 25 (i.e., mild impairment), 8.1% (n = 11) scored between 10 and 17 (i.e., moderate impairment), and 1.5% (n = 2) scored <10 (i.e., severe impairment). After adjusting for other variables, a lower MoCA score was associated with discharge disposition to a location other than home and prolonged length of hospital stay. CONCLUSIONS: Preoperative cognitive function in patients undergoing major head and neck surgery for head and neck cancer was associated with discharge destination and length of stay. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 133:2999-3005, 2023.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Cognición , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología
3.
Cancer Med ; 12(7): 8860-8870, 2023 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36670551

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: While patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) have benefit in cancer clinical trials, real-world applications are lacking. This study describes the method of implementation of a cancer enterprise-wide PROMs platform. METHODS: After establishing a multispecialty stakeholder group within a large integrated health system, domain-specific instruments were selected from the National Institutes of Health's Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) instruments (pain interference, fatigue, physical function, and depression) and were administered at varying frequencies throughout each patient's cancer journey. All cancer patients with an oncologic visit were eligible to complete the PROMs prior to the visit using a patient portal, or at the time of the visit using a tablet. PROMs were integrated into clinical workflow. Clinical partnerships were essential for successful implementation. Descriptive preliminary data were compared using multivariable logistic regression to determine the factors associated with method of PROMs completion. RESULTS: From September 16, 2020 to July 23, 2021, 23 of 38 clinical units (60.5%) implemented PROMs over 2392 encounters and 1666 patients. Approximately one third of patients (n = 629, 37.8%) used the patient portal. Black patients (aOR 0.70; 95% CI: 0.51-0.97) and patients residing in zip codes with higher percentage of unemployment (aOR: 0.07, 95% CI: 0.01-0.41) were among the least likely to complete PROMs using the patient portal. CONCLUSIONS: Successful system-wide implementation of PROMs among cancer patients requires engagement from multispecialty stakeholders and investment from clinical partners. Attention to the method of PROMs collection is required in order to reduce the potential for disparities, such as Black populations and those residing in areas with high levels of unemployment.


Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud , Neoplasias , Humanos , Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Dolor , Neoplasias/terapia
4.
5.
Front Psychol ; 12: 794038, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34956022

RESUMEN

Objective: The Inventory to Measure and Assess imaGe disturbance - Head and Neck (IMAGE-HN) is a validated patient-reported outcome measure of head and neck cancer-related body image-related distress (BID). However, the IMAGE-HN score corresponding to clinically relevant BID is unknown. The study objective is to determine the IMAGE-HN cutoff score that identifies head and neck cancer patients with clinically relevant BID. Methods: We conducted a cross-sectional study at six academic medical centers. Individuals ≥18 years old with a history of head and neck cancer treated with definitive intent were included. The primary outcome measure was the IMAGE-HN. A Receiver Operating Characteristic curve analysis was performed to identify the IMAGE-HN score that maximized sensitivity and specificity relative to a Body Image Scale score of ≥10 (which indicates clinically relevant BID in a general oncology population). To confirm the validity of the IMAGE-HN cutoff score, we compared the severity of depressive [Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)] and anxiety symptoms [Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7)], and quality of life [University of Washington-QOL (UW-QOL)] in patients with IMAGE-HN scores above and below the cutoff. Results: Of the 250 patients, 70.4% were male and the mean age was 62.3 years. An IMAGE-HN score of ≥22 was the optimal cutoff score relative to a Body Image Scale score of ≥10 and represents a clinically relevant level of head and neck cancer-related BID. Relative to those with an IMAGE-HN score of <22, patients with IMAGE-HN scores of ≥22 had a clinically meaningful increase in symptoms of depression (mean PHQ-9 score difference = 5.8) and anxiety (mean GAD-7 score difference = 4.1) as well as worse physical (mean UW-QOL score difference = 18.9) and social-emotional QOL (mean UW-QOL score difference = 21.5). Using an IMAGE-HN cutoff score ≥22, 28% of patients had clinically relevant BID. Conclusion: An IMAGE-HN score of ≥22 identifies patients with clinically relevant head and neck cancer-related BID. This score may be used to detect patients who could benefit from strategies to manage their distress, select patients for studies evaluating interventions to manage head and neck cancer-related BID, and improve our understanding of the underlying epidemiology of the disorder.

6.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 42(4): 102959, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33667796

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Patients with head and neck cancer with Medicaid or no insurance present at a more advanced stage and have lower survival. This study is one of the first to examine the relationship between specific insurance types and overall survival for laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma patients. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective chart review. SETTING: Henry Ford Cancer Institute. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: A retrospective database review was performed using the Henry Ford Virtual Data Warehouse Tumor Registry. Six hundred and fifty patients diagnosed with laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma were identified. Insurance groups analyzed were fee for service, health maintenance organization, Henry Ford Medical Group - a managed care type insurance, Medicare and Medicaid/uninsured. Cox proportional hazards and Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to analyze overall survival and display survival differences respectively. RESULTS: The uninsured group had the lowest median survival time of 29.8 months (95% CI: 20.3-44.8) and the highest HR of 1.85 (95% CI 1.16-2.93) as compared to the HMO group at p < 0.001. Patients with fee for service insurance had longer overall survival compared to the other insurance types. Patients with fee for service insurance also had a high proportion of patients with advanced stage disease, but a younger mean age. Henry Ford Medical Group had a higher mean age and no statistically significant difference in survival when compared to fee for service. (p = 0.999) After controlling for socioeconomic status, insurance type remains a significant predictor of overall survival. CONCLUSIONS: Fee for service had the highest overall survival of the different insurance types, but it was only statistically significant when compared to the Medicaid/uninsured group.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Seguro de Salud/clasificación , Neoplasias Laríngeas/mortalidad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Bases de Datos Factuales , Planes de Aranceles por Servicios , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Neoplasias Laríngeas/patología , Neoplasias Laríngeas/terapia , Masculino , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia
7.
Head Neck ; 43(1): 367-391, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33098180

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aims of this systematic review are to (a) evaluate the current literature on the impact of postoperative therapy for resected squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) on oncologic and non-oncologic outcomes and (b) identify the optimal evidence-based postoperative therapy recommendations for commonly encountered clinical scenarios. METHODS: An analysis of the medical literature from peer-reviewed journals was conducted using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) guideline. Prospective studies and methodology-based systematic reviews and meta-analyses of postoperative therapy for SCCHN were identified by searching Medline (OVID) and EMBASE (Elsevier) using controlled vocabulary terms (ie, National Library of Medicine Medical Subject Headings [MeSH], EMTREE). Study screening and selection was performed with Covidence software and full-text review. The RAND/UCLA appropriateness method was used by the expert panel to rate the appropriate use of postoperative therapy, and the modified Delphi method was used to come to consensus. RESULTS: A total of 5660 studies were identified and screened using the title and abstract, leading to 201 studies assessed for relevance using full-text review. After limitation to the eligibility criteria, 101 studies from 1977 to 2020 were identified, including 77 with oncologic endpoints and 24 with function and quality of life endpoints. All studies reported staging prior to the implementation of American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC-8). CONCLUSIONS: Prospective clinical studies and systematic reviews identified through the PRISMA systematic review provided good evidence for consensus statements regarding the appropriate use of postoperative therapy for resected SCCHN. Further research is needed in domains where consensus by the expert panel could not be achieved for the appropriateness of specific postoperative therapeutic interventions.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Radio (Elemento) , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeza y Cuello/cirugía , Estados Unidos
9.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 42(1): 102816, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33161259

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Investigate the impact of black versus white race, socioeconomic status (SES), and comorbidity burden on oropharyngeal cancer (OPC) survival. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study retrospectively analyzed patients diagnosed between 1991 and 2012 at an urban tertiary care center with a high volume of head and neck cancer referrals. Data gathered included demographics, human papilloma virus (HPV) status, follow-up time, comorbidities, smoking history, and overall survival. SES was extrapolated from the 2000 and 2010 censuses. Analysis of variance, chi-square tests, multivariable Cox proportional hazards models, Cox proportional hazards regression, Kaplan Meier curves and the log-rank test were utilized. RESULTS: Of 208 charts reviewed, 192 patients met inclusion criteria. Black patients had significantly (p < 0.001) poorer survival at 1, 2, and 5 years than white patients (5-year survival: 32% vs 64%); this discrepancy persisted in only HPV-negative disease (20% vs 50%). In the HPV-negative subgroup, there was no racial difference in treatment modality received, Charlson Comorbidity Index, and proportion receiving inadequate, noncurative or no treatment. Univariate analysis identified significant differences in median household income, education level, and stage at presentation between black and white subgroups. Multivariate analysis identified white race and HPV-positive status as independent predictors of overall survival, but SES and stage at presentation were not. CONCLUSION: SES did not explain the greater survival in HPV-negative white versus black patients. This indicates that race is an independent predictor of survival; future studies should examine more accurate indicators of SES and genetic differences in tumors of black and white patients.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/mortalidad , Grupos Raciales , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comorbilidad , Femenino , Predicción , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Socioeconómicos
12.
Laryngoscope ; 130(3): 832-835, 2020 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31059121

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Endocrine surgery is emerging as a dedicated subspecialty in otolaryngology. We assess the impact of an endocrine surgeon on an academic otolaryngology department's thyroid and parathyroid surgery volume. METHODS: A retrospective study of overall endocrine caseloads and resident case logs at a single academic center in the Midwest was performed. All thyroid and parathyroid cases performed by the otolaryngology department at an academic center from 2011 to 2017 were reviewed. In September 2012, an otolaryngologist who had completed an American Head and Neck Society endocrine surgery fellowship joined the faculty. The volume of endocrine surgery performed by the residents was also analyzed. Comparison of means and linear regression models were performed. RESULTS: From 2011 to 2012, the department performed a mean of 77 thyroid and 11.5 parathyroid surgeries annually. After the endocrine surgeon joined the department, this increased to an average of 212.8 thyroidectomies (P < 0.01) and 72.4 parathyroidectomies (P < 0.01) a year. The head and neck surgeons and generalists still performed an average of 42.4 thyroidectomies and 2.6 parathyroidectomies a year. For graduating residents, the average number of thyroid/parathyroid cases increased from 42.5 in 2012 to 151 in 2016. CONCLUSION: The addition of a fellowship-trained endocrine surgeon substantially increased the thyroid and parathyroid surgical volume of the otolaryngology department. Importantly, generalists and head and neck surgeons in the department continued to perform a significant number of these cases. Departments seeking similar surgical growth and expanded resident experience may consider the value of engaging a dedicated endocrine surgeon. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 130:832-835, 2020.


Asunto(s)
Departamentos de Hospitales , Otolaringología , Paratiroidectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Tiroidectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Paratiroidectomía/educación , Estudios Retrospectivos , Especialidades Quirúrgicas/educación , Tiroidectomía/educación , Factores de Tiempo
13.
Head Neck ; 41(11): 3948-3959, 2019 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31490588

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Oropharyngeal cancer survivors experience difficulty returning to work after treatment. To better understand specific barriers to returning to work, we investigated factors associated with discontinuing employment among older and working-age survivors. METHODS: The sample included 675 oropharyngeal cancer survivors (median: 6 years posttreatment) diagnosed from 2000 to 2013 and employed at diagnosis. Relative risk models were constructed to examine the independent associations of demographic and health factors, and symptom experiences per the MD Anderson Symptom Inventory - Head and Neck Module (MDASI-HN) with posttreatment employment, overall and by age (<60 years vs ≥60 years at survey). RESULTS: Symptom interference was not statistically significantly associated with posttreatment employment status among respondents ≥60 years. Among working-age respondents <60 years, symptom interference was strongly associated with posttreatment employment. CONCLUSIONS: Efforts to assess and lessen symptom burden in working-age survivors should be evaluated as approaches to support regaining core functions needed for continued employment.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/complicaciones , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/complicaciones , Reinserción al Trabajo , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/diagnóstico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Escolaridad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas/terapia , Factores de Riesgo , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Evaluación de Síntomas
14.
J Cancer Res Ther ; 15(3): 582-588, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31169224

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: We sought to determine whether smokers with oral cavity squamous cell carcinoma (OCSCC) have tumors with more adverse pathological features than in nonsmokers and whether or not these are predictive of outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We retrospectively identified 163 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer stages I-IVa OCSCC diagnosed between 2005 and 2015 and treated with curative intent. A pathological risk score (PRS) was calculated using the National Comprehensive Cancer Network adverse risk factors: positive margin, extracapsular extension of lymph node metastases, pT3 or pT4 primary, N2 or N3 nodal disease, perineural invasion, and lymphovascular space invasion. Multivariable models were constructed to determine the independent predictors of overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and PRS. RESULTS: A total of 108 (66.26%) were smokers and 55 nonsmokers. Three-year actuarial OS and RFS were 62% and 68% in smokers and 81% and 69% in nonsmokers, respectively (P = 0.06 and P = 0.63). Smokers were more likely to have advanced disease stage and tumors with aggressive pathological features than nonsmokers. Smokers had significantly worse PRS (mean ± standard deviation; 2.38 ± 2.19, median; 2.00) than nonsmokers (0.89 ± 1.21, 0.00) (P < 0.001). Older age, higher PRS, and smoking status were independent predictors of OS. Smoking or PRS did not predict for worse RFS. On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of PRS were smoking status and grade (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients with OCSCC, smokers have more aggressive disease as evidenced by more adverse pathological features than nonsmokers. Moreover, smoking is an independent predictor of OS but not RFS. The PRS is a significant predictor of OS and needs validation in the future studies.


Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/etiología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/patología , Neoplasias de la Boca/etiología , Neoplasias de la Boca/patología , Fumar/efectos adversos , Adulto , Anciano , Biopsia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas/terapia , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Boca/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Boca/terapia , Metástasis de la Neoplasia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Pronóstico , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Carga Tumoral
16.
Head Neck ; 41(4): 1087-1093, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30620439

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: This article describes the benefits of patient-driven research in the field of head and neck oncology, reviews lessons learned from establishing partnerships with patients and caregivers, and serves as a model for further patient-driven research endeavors. METHODS: Head and neck cancer survivors underwent training including that of effective communication and the basics of research methodology. They then drove the agendas for monthly meetings that included a multidisciplinary team of providers, facilitated by a physician champion (S.S.C.). RESULTS: The advisors reported concrete areas for improvement of the clinical flow, including the formation of a dental oncology clinic and a post-treatment survivorship clinic. They also refined research topics of interest, such as treatment regret. The advisors have also driven efforts to increase public awareness and have participated in cancer symposiums and local presentations. CONCLUSION: Patient-driven research improves the relevance and implementation of head and neck oncology research and clinical processes.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/epidemiología , Comunicación Interdisciplinaria , Participación del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Sobrevivientes/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Cuidadores/organización & administración , Femenino , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Innovación Organizacional , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/organización & administración , Proyectos de Investigación , Supervivencia , Estados Unidos
17.
Laryngoscope ; 129(4): 847-851, 2019 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30467863

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Mortality has been reported to be 22% to 45% in patients with a tracheostomy. To better counsel patients and families, we aimed to determine the effect of body mass index (BMI), socioeconomic status (SES), and the 17 conditions of the Charlson comorbidity index (CCI) on 30-day survival posttracheostomy. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study identified adult patients enrolled from our institution in the Global Tracheostomy Collaborative database from March 2014 to June 2015. Data collected included age, BMI, residential zip code, and comorbidities. Cox proportionate univariate and multivariate analyses were used to measure the impact of BMI, SES, and CCI variables with 30-day posttracheostomy survival. We used geocoding as a surrogate for patients' SES. We used Deyo's modification of the CCI, which utilized International Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, codes to identify comorbidities. RESULTS: Of 326 tracheostomies identified, the 30-day mortality rate was 15.6%. No significant differences were noted in BMI or in any of the SES categories between survivors and nonsurvivors. CCI was significantly higher in the 30-day mortality group. Congestive heart failure (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.39), severe liver disease (HR = 3.15), and peripheral vascular disease (HR = 2.62) were found to significantly impact 30-day survival. CONCLUSION: Higher CCI and specifically severe liver disease, congestive heart failure, and peripheral vascular disease were associated with increased 30-day mortality posttracheostomy. No association was found between BMI or SES and 30-day survival. This study identified three comorbidities that independently affect mortality in tracheostomy patients, which should be discussed with patients and families before tracheostomy. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 129:847-851, 2019.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Hepatopatías/mortalidad , Enfermedades Vasculares Periféricas/mortalidad , Traqueostomía/mortalidad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Comorbilidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Clasificación Internacional de Enfermedades , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Clase Social , Factores de Tiempo
18.
Endocr Pract ; 24(11): 941-947, 2018 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30084685

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Black patients have a significantly lower incidence of well-differentiated thyroid cancer (WDTC) compared to all other race/ethnic groups, while white patients appear to be at greater risk. This study examines incidental thyroid nodules (ITNs) to assess whether racial disparities in WDTC arise from a differential discovery of ITNs-perhaps due to socioeconomic disparities-or reflect true differences in thyroid cancer rates. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed of all patients who underwent fine-needle aspiration (FNA) of thyroid nodules by our academic medical center's endocrinology division between January 2006 and December 2010. Medical records were reviewed to identify whether the biopsied thyroid nodule was discovered incidentally through nonthyroid-related imaging or identified by palpation. RESULTS: FNAs were performed on 1,369 total thyroid nodules in 1,141 study patients; 547 (48%) were classified as white, and 593 (52%) were classified as nonwhite. Among this cohort, 36.6% of patients underwent biopsy for an ITN. White patients were 1.6 times more likely to have undergone a biopsy for a nodule that was incidentally identified compared to nonwhites ( P<.0001). Indicators of socioeconomic status (SES) did not have a significant association with ITNs. Within the ITN cohort, 4.9% of nonwhite patients were found to have a thyroid malignancy compared to 12.9% of white patients ( P<.01). CONCLUSION: The higher incidence of thyroid cancer in white patients appears to be not only due to diagnostic bias, but also to a true difference in cancer prevalence. ABBREVIATIONS: FNA = fine-needle aspiration; ITN = incidental thyroid nodule; SEER = Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results; SES = socioeconomic status; WDTC = well-differentiated thyroid cancer.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja Fina/estadística & datos numéricos , Negro o Afroamericano/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/etnología , Hallazgos Incidentales , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/etnología , Nódulo Tiroideo/etnología , Población Blanca/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Clase Social , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/patología , Nódulo Tiroideo/epidemiología , Nódulo Tiroideo/patología , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
19.
Head Neck ; 40(7): 1508-1514, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29522260

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Many attribute the rise in incidence of thyroid cancer to a deluge of radiologically identified incidental thyroid nodules. The clinical implications are unclear. METHODS: A review was performed of all patients who underwent fine-needle aspirations of thyroid nodules by our academic medical center's Endocrinology Division between 2006 and 2010. Medical records were reviewed to identify whether the thyroid nodule was discovered incidentally or by palpation. RESULTS: Of 1153 patients, 37.4% underwent a biopsy because of an incidental thyroid nodule. These patients were significantly more likely to be >45 years old, men, white race, and with a body mass index >30 kg/m2 . Of the 17.2% of incidentalomas that led to surgery, 8.5% were found to be thyroid cancer. CONCLUSION: Thyroid nodules discovered incidentally are increasing the diagnosis of subclinical thyroid cancers. Not investigated previously, our study found that the mode of detection was not related to malignancy or surgery.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia con Aguja Fina , Hallazgos Incidentales , Palpación , Nódulo Tiroideo/patología , Adulto , Distribución por Edad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Michigan/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Distribución por Sexo , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Nódulo Tiroideo/diagnóstico por imagen , Población Blanca , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...